Introducer Today

Make this my homepage | Add to favourites

News Story

MPs' final salary pensions affect recruitment

Friday 17th July 2009

By Sam Collins

The existing final salary pension scheme for MPs should be scrapped for needlessly taking on pension risks on behalf of the taxpayer and for failing to be an effective tool in recruiting or retaining diverse and talented individuals to the profession.

This is the response the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) gave to the Senior Salaries Review Body consultation on the review of MPs’ pensions.

Charles Cotton, Reward Adviser at the CIPD calls for the parliamentary contributory pension fund to be replaced by a flexible benefit scheme.

Under this arrangement, MPs would receive a flexible benefit account (fixed as a percentage of their salary) that they could then use to contribute to a personal pension, purchase other benefits or take the amount as cash and invest it in other financial products. He also recommends that this approach be adopted by the Scottish Parliament and the Assemblies in Wales and Northern Ireland.

Cotton said: "The CIPD believes that such an approach can help support the recruitment and retention of individuals from a wider talent pool, by offering choice and putting pensions at the heart of a total reward strategy.

"This will help create a parliament that reflects the society it purports to represent. Such an approach would also lead to more transparency over how, and how much, parliamentarians are being remunerated, so taxpayers would know the total pay costs of their MPs.

"If the final salary scheme is to be retained, however, then it should be made more affordable by increasing MPs' contribution, reducing the accrual rate, capping the pensionable salary, removing the option to buy added years, removing the option to transfer in benefits accrued in another pension, increasing the normal retirement age and reducing the pension for early retirement. These changes are all that many firms with defined benefit schemes have been forced to adopt over the past decade – there is no reason why it should not apply to MPs too."

Have your say on this story using the comment section below

View Comments 2 comments

Posted By Vinny on Friday 17th July 2009 09:42:49
The only effect I see this having on recruitment is stopping millions of us trying to become MPs. Climb on that gravy train!!

Posted By Mr Speaker on Friday 17th July 2009 09:40:56
I'd like to be an MP and enjoy all those perks. Oh yes Mrs Speaker!

Post Comments

Most Read News Stories:

idibu releases instant quote tool for multi-posting
Monday 13th July 2009

Recruitment agencies fined £39.27m for price-fixing
Wednesday 30th September 2009

Workers follow 'gangster chic' dress code to be seen as powerful leaders
Thursday 1st October 2009

Chelsea boss Carlo Ancelotti backs new training programme to help people into work
Wednesday 2nd December 2009

Swine flu self-certification backed by CIPD
Tuesday 14th July 2009

Send to a Friend

Discuss in Forum

RSS Feed

Share this article:

Digg it

Del.icio.us

Newsvine

Nowpublic

Feedback:

If you have any questions or suggestions about this article or our news section, please don't hesitate to contact us.

Recruitment Today

End of beginning as downturn slows slightly
The seasonally-adjusted CIPS/Markit Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) rose to 42.9 in April from 39.1 the previous month, but was lower than last year’s figure of 49.7. Despite remaining below the neutral 50.0 mark (a figure less than 50 indicates a contraction) for the 13th month running, the PMI moved further from February’s joint survey record low.